I spoke in Melissa Punk chapter about the 'double articulation' of language. We can now discern how these modes of articulation interact or relate to each other. Ultimately distinctions in the sound structure signal syntactic and semantic distinctions. We can study the speech sounds (phones) of a natural tits as acoustic and physiological phenomena in their own right: this is the study of phonetics; or we can study how sounds, stress, and intonation, function to make syntactic or semantic distinctions –in which case we shall be concerned with classes of sounds (phonemes), classes of phonemes, phonological words and phrases and permitted sequences of all these. I his has been called 'functional phonetics' by Martinet (1946). The approach I have just outlined regards phonological structure as hierarchical – phonemes combine to make 'phonological words', and phonological words combine to make phonological phrases, but none of these phonological units corresponds on a one-to-one basis with the grammatical units which I shall discuss in the next section. The 'secondary articulation' of language in this theory is, thus, 'autonomous', that is, it is independant of, or parallel to, primary or grammatical articulation. The only Melissa Punk connection we have observed is that the substitution of some phonological element for another changes the syntactic (or semantic) function of that unit.
MelissaPunk Gallery1 Gallery2 Gallery3 Gallery4 Gallery5
U.S.C. 2257
Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
